tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6127132400597215190.post6309394957266477078..comments2009-12-24T10:31:25.283-08:00Mikehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13599208082890099005noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6127132400597215190.post-82159429622006477942009-12-04T11:34:10.137-08:002009-12-04T11:34:10.137-08:00&gt; I have found a fairly complicated <br />&gt; way of working around the isue<br /><br />What way did you find? Even if it is complicated, I&#39;d like to know it.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6127132400597215190.post-68914506286860719862009-03-05T09:21:00.000-08:002009-03-05T09:21:00.000-08:00You would think that would work, and of course I tried it, but it doesn't solve my particular problem. The child will take up the extra given space and not give it back even if it is told it has less space when you do Arrange().Mikehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13599208082890099005noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6127132400597215190.post-67999648265790504322009-03-05T06:29:00.000-08:002009-03-05T06:29:00.000-08:00you can pass an infinite size or return a greater size than the constraintAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com